My hobbies include being too emotionally invested in the success, or lack thereof, of random men and more importantly the teams they play for, tv shows, and crawling into holes. Eels, Reds and Hawks babayy.
Just made a twitter "HelloooLiana" and instagram "AhoyhoyLiana" so follow me and we can be friends :)
Rebloggable by request
I guess it’s a cultural thing..
the short list
not enough time ever to post all the things…..
damn. did that answer your question?
Right, because bad things only happen when white people are involved.
Mayans and Aztecs weren’t carving people’s hearts outs of their chests for the gods, they were doing it for white people.
The Mongols killing at least 30,000,000 people? Caused by white people.
Along with Mao and his death toll, also white.
Armenian genocide at the hands of the Turkish? Nope, at the hands of white people.
Japanese Empire raping, killing, and looting all over the Pacific? Caused by white people.
Native Americans being tribes of warrior societies who constantly fought each other? Not until white people came along
Iroquois tribes being imperialistic land grabbing machines of brutality? Nope, only white people can be imperialistic.
Yuan-Ming dynasty transition? White people.
Qing conquering of the Ming dynasty? White people.
Taiping Rebellion? White people.
An Lushan Rebellion? White people.
Congo wars? White people.
Somalian Civil War? White people.
Nigerian Civil War? White people
Rwanda? Caused by white people.
Nairobi Mall attack? White people.
Cambodian Genocide? White people
Benghali Genocide? White people.
Cops and soldiers abusing their power? All cops and soldiers are white people of course.
Hispanic man shooting a black man who was punching him in the face? White people.
The fucking ignorance and cognitive dissonance it must take to make this kind of post must cause some serious medical issues. Douche-baggary is not a trait solely found in white people, who historically, were actually pretty late to the game.
But it’s cool. You can all jerk each other off over how much you hate white people all you like, but you have to sit at the kiddie table with the Neo-Nazis, while the people who don’t see the world in shades of melanin ignore you and talk like adults.
^I ACTUALLY GOT TO MY FEET AND APPLAUDED THAT COMMENT.
fuck you op
This one is probably one of the best 4chan posts of all time.
Actually, no. It’s okay if he’s not ready to be a dad. He has the right to walk away from a child once it’s born. He will have to pay for child support, since it is a child's right to be supported (at least financially) by both parents, but he won't be forced to be a father to the child. Also, there's nothing wrong with having an open discussion prior to intercourse deciding how you both feel you would deal with an unintended pregnancy. If he is aware that his partner would not have an abortion, he might want to be extra careful that he doesn't get her pregnant if he's not ready to be a father.
When the fetus develops inside of him, impacting his health, then it will be his body, and his choice.
Just wanted to mention too that child support laws are written in a way that actually favours men.
You see if the parents of the child were not married at the time of birth he is under no obligation to pay child support, he is not legally required to unless he requests visitation rights or joint custody.
If they were married he is.
Unless he revokes his parental rights and his rights to visitation.
Basically he’s only required to give child support if he wants to see the child.
I’m sorry, but that is simply not true. In California, if a mother puts a man’s name down as the father (and she has to name a father if she want’s state benefits such as WIC, food stamps, medicare, ect.), then the state will go after that man for child support aggressively. you only have 30 days to fight the naming of being a father with a DNA test. The problem is that the mother can write down any name, even ones she thinks is fake. Which will then sometimes result in a man from the other end the country being notified that they are a father of a child in California to a woman they never met and will therefor have to pay child support. And even if the biological father shows up with DNA proof, the courts won’t stop trying to get child support from the man the woman first named.
There are court precedents of women raping men, or minors, having a child from said rape, and the courts then force the male victim of rape to pay child support for the child that resulted from him being raped.
There are also court precedents of women stealing sperm and getting pregnant that way, the courts till require child support from men who have had their sperm stolen.
There are court precedents of men being required to pay child support from children that were conceived through medical science; i.e. men who have donated sperm have been forced to pay child support for children conceived through artificial insemination.
I could keep going, but needless to say, no. Child support laws in no way, shape, or form favor men.